It’s Happy Canada Day and in that spirit we’d like to join our readers today in celebrating, reveling, even marinading in the greatness of this country, its people, its resources and its culture.
We are perfect, no. But we realize this, and that is part of being Canadian. And so is a certain humility, sometimes almost embarrassment, about waving the maple leaf on this, our one day of the year, to shout and rant about the greatness of this country. Allow us to add a few more reasons to be proud of your country today with this list of Canadian people, places, things and inventions that spark, for us, the flame of national pride. And if we’ve left out something precious (and of course we have) let us know.
* Hockey (or basketball… or curling)
* Wayne Gretzky (or Sidney Crosby or Mike Weir)
* Celine Dion (or Alanis Morrissette or Shania Twain)
* The Toronto Blue Jays (hey, when they were good, they were GOOD)
* Eh? (Is it a question? Is it punctuation? Is it a word? Only a Canadian knows for sure)
* Tim’s (It is this country’s most widespread addiction. All things considered, we could be hooked on worse things)
* No medical bills
* Smarties (or Shreddies or dill pickle flavoured chips – OK some of these are available in the UK too)
* The queen is on our money.
* The Canadarm
* The goalie mask
* Five-pin bowling
* Fish (from the king cod to the wild salmon to the lobster to farmed fish of today, our finned and scaly friends have always been a staple)
* The Jolly Jumper
* Ogopogo (or the Lake Utopia Monster and we’ll lay claim to Big Foot too – he’s been spotted recently in Kokanee beer ads from British Columbia)
* Bloody Caesar
* The paint roller
* Trivial Pursuit
* The phone (love it or hate it, this Canadian invention ranks among those that had the most dramatic impact on the world over the past two centuries)
* The zipper (and if you’re wondering why your zipper has “YYK” on it, it’s the name of the world’s leading zipper maker – a Japanese company)
* Tommy Douglas (the Greatest Canadian, as named by CBC viewers in 2004 brought us Medicare, welfare, pensions and mothers’ allowances)
* The other greatest Canadians - Terry Fox, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Sir Frederick Banting, David Suzuki, Lester B. Pearson, Don Cherry, Sir John A. Macdonald, Alexander Graham Bell and Wayne Gretzky (him again)
* Mike Myers (or Jim Carrey or John Candy)
* Speaking of candy… James and Gilbert Ganong (and Arthur and R. Whidden and David too… oh and Laura Secord)
* The Beaver
* Our war veterans (a disappearing national treasure)
* The canoe (and the bold, clear, wide and fresh rivers we paddle)
* The view (no matter where in Canada you are or where in Canada you’re from, the view from here is simply the best and we are all fortunate, and today we are all thankful, that when we look at the world we get to see it through the eyes of a Canadian).
Monday, June 30, 2008
Friday, June 27, 2008
Phun with Op Eds
We have another Tuesday holiday coming up which makes today, Friday, feel like a Monday. It's a newspaper biz phenomenon we call Fronday.
Usually on Frondays we like to play "Find the Self-Sufficiency" reference in Premier Shawn Graham's news releases but it got to be too easy. Our cat, Princess Maggie, was playing and scoring quite well. She's now working in the premier's office, actually.
So today we introduce a new Fronday game called: See if you can find the cheeky edit in Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's Op Ed.
It's a challenging one and you'll likely have to read every single word to find the ones we inserted. Good luck.
See if you can find the edit...
Providing responsible leadership in this period of global economic uncertainty
JIM FLAHERTY
Guest Commentay
Canada’s government is providing responsible leadership by focusing on the priorities of Canadians.
This is helping Canada weather this global economic storm.
A recent report from the OECD recognizes that Canada’s economic strengths and its policy recommendations largely accord with the direction our government is taking.
We reacted swiftly to this situation in the October Economic Statement and maintained our course in Budget 2008 by lowering taxes, reducing debt and investing in people, knowledge and communities.
To this end, and in support of our long-term economic plan, Advantage Canada, the Parliament has now passed Bill C-50. This legislation implements key measures of the 2008 federal Budget such as the innovative new Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), a modern immigration system, more front line police officers, additional investments in public transit and further support for innovation, research, and post-secondary students. This legislation will strengthen our economic fundamentals and better position Canada to compete in the highly competitive global economy.
The Tax Free Savings Account, which comes into effect Jan. 1, 2009, is the single most important personal savings vehicle since the introduction of the RRSP. This flexible, registered, general-purpose account is the first of its kind in our history and will allow Canadians to watch their savings grow, tax-free. The response of Canadians has been overwhelmingly positive. To learn more, visit the Tax Free Savings Account calculator at www.budget.gc.ca to see for yourself how this initiative can benefit you.
Briefly, here is how the TFSA will work. First, Canadians can contribute up to $5,000 every year to a registered Tax-Free Savings Account. This is money that has already been taxed. Second, the investment income, the capital gains, interest or dividends, earned in the plan will be exempt from tax, even when withdrawn. Third, Canadians can withdraw from the account at any time without restriction. Better yet, there are no restrictions on what they can save for. Finally, the full amount of withdrawals may be re-contributed to a person’s Tax-Free Savings Account in the future, to ensure no loss in a person’s total savings room.
Bill C-50 also invests in people by modernizing the Canadian immigration system. It will shorten wait times and help make Canada’s economy more competitive. The objective is to create a system that will allow more immigrants into the country sooner -- whether it’s getting families reunited faster or getting skilled workers to work sooner.
The system will be fair, open and transparent. It will help create a Knowledge Advantage in Canada by matching the skills of newcomers with immediate labour market needs. As a result, newcomers will have more opportunities to find work sooner, to provide a better life for themselves and their families and thus succeed in the modern Canadian economy.
Our government recognizes the importance of education and how it contributes to the prosperity of our country. That is why we are investing in our future, with a new consolidated Canada Student Grant Program which will take effect in the fall of 2009. This major investment of $350 million in 2009–2010 will rise to $430 million in 2012–2013.
Going forward, all federal grants will be integrated into one program that will provide more effective support to more students for more years of study, assisting Canadian families who struggle with the cost of higher education.
The fact is that Canadian students and their families need simple, effective financial assistance programs. That is why we have also committed $123 million over four years starting in 2009–2010 to streamline and modernize the Canada Student Loans Program. Improvements will include expanded online services to help students better manage their loans, more equitable supports for part-time and married students, and enhanced flexibility for those students experiencing difficulty in debt repayment -- including those with disabilities.
The government is also helping learners and innovators contribute to our country’s future by enhancing the flexibility of RESPs, by investing in new scholarships for doctoral students, as well as dedicating funds for research such as health, industrial and automotive innovation, and social and economic development of the North.
Bill C-50 contains other important measures including support for the provinces and territories to recruit 2,500 new front-line police officers and investments in public transit infrastructure to reduce gridlock and keep Canada moving forward.
Our government shares Canadians’ desire for a better and more prosperous Canada. Bill C-50 builds upon this government’s work in previous budgets and economic statements and is part of our vision to achieve that goal. Canadians can be confident that this government will continue to act to ensure that our economic fundamentals remain solid today and long into the future. In bed.
Usually on Frondays we like to play "Find the Self-Sufficiency" reference in Premier Shawn Graham's news releases but it got to be too easy. Our cat, Princess Maggie, was playing and scoring quite well. She's now working in the premier's office, actually.
So today we introduce a new Fronday game called: See if you can find the cheeky edit in Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's Op Ed.
It's a challenging one and you'll likely have to read every single word to find the ones we inserted. Good luck.
See if you can find the edit...
Providing responsible leadership in this period of global economic uncertainty
JIM FLAHERTY
Guest Commentay
Canada’s government is providing responsible leadership by focusing on the priorities of Canadians.
This is helping Canada weather this global economic storm.
A recent report from the OECD recognizes that Canada’s economic strengths and its policy recommendations largely accord with the direction our government is taking.
We reacted swiftly to this situation in the October Economic Statement and maintained our course in Budget 2008 by lowering taxes, reducing debt and investing in people, knowledge and communities.
To this end, and in support of our long-term economic plan, Advantage Canada, the Parliament has now passed Bill C-50. This legislation implements key measures of the 2008 federal Budget such as the innovative new Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), a modern immigration system, more front line police officers, additional investments in public transit and further support for innovation, research, and post-secondary students. This legislation will strengthen our economic fundamentals and better position Canada to compete in the highly competitive global economy.
The Tax Free Savings Account, which comes into effect Jan. 1, 2009, is the single most important personal savings vehicle since the introduction of the RRSP. This flexible, registered, general-purpose account is the first of its kind in our history and will allow Canadians to watch their savings grow, tax-free. The response of Canadians has been overwhelmingly positive. To learn more, visit the Tax Free Savings Account calculator at www.budget.gc.ca to see for yourself how this initiative can benefit you.
Briefly, here is how the TFSA will work. First, Canadians can contribute up to $5,000 every year to a registered Tax-Free Savings Account. This is money that has already been taxed. Second, the investment income, the capital gains, interest or dividends, earned in the plan will be exempt from tax, even when withdrawn. Third, Canadians can withdraw from the account at any time without restriction. Better yet, there are no restrictions on what they can save for. Finally, the full amount of withdrawals may be re-contributed to a person’s Tax-Free Savings Account in the future, to ensure no loss in a person’s total savings room.
Bill C-50 also invests in people by modernizing the Canadian immigration system. It will shorten wait times and help make Canada’s economy more competitive. The objective is to create a system that will allow more immigrants into the country sooner -- whether it’s getting families reunited faster or getting skilled workers to work sooner.
The system will be fair, open and transparent. It will help create a Knowledge Advantage in Canada by matching the skills of newcomers with immediate labour market needs. As a result, newcomers will have more opportunities to find work sooner, to provide a better life for themselves and their families and thus succeed in the modern Canadian economy.
Our government recognizes the importance of education and how it contributes to the prosperity of our country. That is why we are investing in our future, with a new consolidated Canada Student Grant Program which will take effect in the fall of 2009. This major investment of $350 million in 2009–2010 will rise to $430 million in 2012–2013.
Going forward, all federal grants will be integrated into one program that will provide more effective support to more students for more years of study, assisting Canadian families who struggle with the cost of higher education.
The fact is that Canadian students and their families need simple, effective financial assistance programs. That is why we have also committed $123 million over four years starting in 2009–2010 to streamline and modernize the Canada Student Loans Program. Improvements will include expanded online services to help students better manage their loans, more equitable supports for part-time and married students, and enhanced flexibility for those students experiencing difficulty in debt repayment -- including those with disabilities.
The government is also helping learners and innovators contribute to our country’s future by enhancing the flexibility of RESPs, by investing in new scholarships for doctoral students, as well as dedicating funds for research such as health, industrial and automotive innovation, and social and economic development of the North.
Bill C-50 contains other important measures including support for the provinces and territories to recruit 2,500 new front-line police officers and investments in public transit infrastructure to reduce gridlock and keep Canada moving forward.
Our government shares Canadians’ desire for a better and more prosperous Canada. Bill C-50 builds upon this government’s work in previous budgets and economic statements and is part of our vision to achieve that goal. Canadians can be confident that this government will continue to act to ensure that our economic fundamentals remain solid today and long into the future. In bed.
It's not my fault I'm an addict
Patrick Cummins
An Alternate Aspect
There are, of course, always exceptions and on reading the following you will know if that is the case. But beware fooling yourself that it does not apply to you. The only result of a false diagnosis will be that you suffer even more.
Krista Campbell in her recent column, Witticisms and Criticisms, bemoaned the lack of effort required in today's world – the pampering and the ease with which everything is accomplished while removing any challenge. To this I would add the parallel growth of the “it's not my fault” culture.
So if you have the body mass index of a flatulent hippopotamus you whine: “It's not my fault I'm fat, it's genetic, or: “It's not my fault I take drugs, I'm an addict and can't help it” or: “It's not my fault I'm unemployed, nobody wants me.”
The provincial government is, of course, only too pleased to play along and even encourage this attitude. You can become fodder for their coterie of “Social Workers”, a.k.a. I went to university on government grants and wasted three years getting a worthless or unusable arts degree, couldn't get a job in the real world so swelled the ranks of the demonstrably inept and incompetent provincial civil service to counsel people like you.
This generates the perfect symbiosis, the employed but incompetent fool counselling the troubled and probably unemployed fool.
“No! Being overweight is not your fault it is because of your upbringing/genes/circumstances/anything but the truth, let's work on a plan to help you which we know will not work but will keep me employed and you on welfare or unemployment.”
If you need help at self-identification and are asking: “Can this possibly be me?” You probably drink Budweiser or Coors light, actually like Tim Hortons coffee and exist for six days a week on Kraft dinner with a culinary treat of fried fish fingers or 'burger on the seventh day.
Here’s a simple example of our leaders' folly. The provincial government knows it is encouraging prescription drug abuse and by extension the addiction to illegal drugs by its action, or lack thereof, in the issuing and control of prescriptions. A quick start to control these would be to charge the doctor (say $50) for every prescription form, suitably copy protected, and not refund the monies until the original form was redeemed. But the approach is to not even attempt to control these deadly missives because the medical profession refuses to co-operate. So, again, the province abdicates its responsibility. Then, to make matters worse, the government proposes methadone clinics which, if anything, do nothing but replace a manageable but illegal addiction with an unmanageable legal addiction.
One could detail many other forms of government facilitation of short sighted, inept behaviour, suffice to say their own conduct serves as the model they choose to operate by.
By any standard of logic, the caring “you poor lost soul” approach should be replaced with a swift kick up the backside and the admonition to “get a life.” The only reason you are grossly fat, sorry, overweight, is because you determine that will be the case: YOU eat too much. You are an addict because YOU and only you take drugs. You are an alcoholic because YOU drink too much, period! But of course, in this day and age, logic is long departed and only fools are left to counsel us.
Failure to take control, to take action may result in a wasted life, welfare, unemployment, living in flophouses or on the street. A bleak, blank existence, spirit unfulfilled and probably an early agonizing death. Agonizing because you will realize, as you depart, that you could have done so much better and the only reason you failed is YOU.
You are the only one who can better your lot. Do it. NOW!
Patrick Cummins appears every second Friday. He WANTS to hear your comments and criticisms. E-mail him at brook99a@myrealbox.com or comment online at saintcroixcourier.blogspot.com
An Alternate Aspect
There are, of course, always exceptions and on reading the following you will know if that is the case. But beware fooling yourself that it does not apply to you. The only result of a false diagnosis will be that you suffer even more.
Krista Campbell in her recent column, Witticisms and Criticisms, bemoaned the lack of effort required in today's world – the pampering and the ease with which everything is accomplished while removing any challenge. To this I would add the parallel growth of the “it's not my fault” culture.
So if you have the body mass index of a flatulent hippopotamus you whine: “It's not my fault I'm fat, it's genetic, or: “It's not my fault I take drugs, I'm an addict and can't help it” or: “It's not my fault I'm unemployed, nobody wants me.”
The provincial government is, of course, only too pleased to play along and even encourage this attitude. You can become fodder for their coterie of “Social Workers”, a.k.a. I went to university on government grants and wasted three years getting a worthless or unusable arts degree, couldn't get a job in the real world so swelled the ranks of the demonstrably inept and incompetent provincial civil service to counsel people like you.
This generates the perfect symbiosis, the employed but incompetent fool counselling the troubled and probably unemployed fool.
“No! Being overweight is not your fault it is because of your upbringing/genes/circumstances/anything but the truth, let's work on a plan to help you which we know will not work but will keep me employed and you on welfare or unemployment.”
If you need help at self-identification and are asking: “Can this possibly be me?” You probably drink Budweiser or Coors light, actually like Tim Hortons coffee and exist for six days a week on Kraft dinner with a culinary treat of fried fish fingers or 'burger on the seventh day.
Here’s a simple example of our leaders' folly. The provincial government knows it is encouraging prescription drug abuse and by extension the addiction to illegal drugs by its action, or lack thereof, in the issuing and control of prescriptions. A quick start to control these would be to charge the doctor (say $50) for every prescription form, suitably copy protected, and not refund the monies until the original form was redeemed. But the approach is to not even attempt to control these deadly missives because the medical profession refuses to co-operate. So, again, the province abdicates its responsibility. Then, to make matters worse, the government proposes methadone clinics which, if anything, do nothing but replace a manageable but illegal addiction with an unmanageable legal addiction.
One could detail many other forms of government facilitation of short sighted, inept behaviour, suffice to say their own conduct serves as the model they choose to operate by.
By any standard of logic, the caring “you poor lost soul” approach should be replaced with a swift kick up the backside and the admonition to “get a life.” The only reason you are grossly fat, sorry, overweight, is because you determine that will be the case: YOU eat too much. You are an addict because YOU and only you take drugs. You are an alcoholic because YOU drink too much, period! But of course, in this day and age, logic is long departed and only fools are left to counsel us.
Failure to take control, to take action may result in a wasted life, welfare, unemployment, living in flophouses or on the street. A bleak, blank existence, spirit unfulfilled and probably an early agonizing death. Agonizing because you will realize, as you depart, that you could have done so much better and the only reason you failed is YOU.
You are the only one who can better your lot. Do it. NOW!
Patrick Cummins appears every second Friday. He WANTS to hear your comments and criticisms. E-mail him at brook99a@myrealbox.com or comment online at saintcroixcourier.blogspot.com
Truck hangs from bridge
Claudette Norman/submitted photo
A truck hangs from a bridge over the Magaguadavic River on Thursday afternoon. There were no injuries and occupants of the truck got out the passenger side doors.
Our bad...
CORRECTION
In the June 27 Courier Weekend we reported that construction work on King Street in St. Stephen will be completed by July 8. In fact the work is slated for completion on July 18.
In the June 27 Courier Weekend we reported that construction work on King Street in St. Stephen will be completed by July 8. In fact the work is slated for completion on July 18.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
In your COURIER WEEKEND...
What we're working on for the Courier Weekend, June 27
UTOPIA TEEN IS CHARLOTTE COUNTY'S NEXT BIG TALENT
Chuck Brown/CourierNick Gay, 15, of Lake Utopia, won over the audience and won $1,500 Tuesday at the Charlotte County's Got Talent finale. Some judges urged him to audition for Canadian Idol.
* SANTA SHAWN IS COMING TO TOWN
Premier Shawn Graham comes to St. Stephen and St. George on Friday bearing gifts of money and the promise of jobs
* MOM FUMES OVER HIT AND RUN SENTENCE
Woman says Grand Manan teen should have been jailed
* MISS TEEN NB IS A ST. STEPHEN GIRL
Amanda Stanley is off to Toronto pageant
* COLD WAR ON ICE
While arena sits locked and empty, St. Andrews mayor defends decision not to prop up hockey school and takes a slash at former NHLer
* FLATULENT HIPPOS...
...as Dave Barry would say, would be a good name for a rock band. Find out what our columnist, Patrick Cummins, has to say about the state of the nation's waistlines. He'll see you... in health.
* THAT'S THE WAY, UH HUH UH HUH, SHE LIKES IT
Columnist Krista Campbell flips her, uh, "complaining" switch and writes about the good things in life
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Etiquette Guy pompous, pretentious
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
After reading the “Etiquette Guy” in the June 21 edition of the Telegraph- Journal, we feel it necessary to object to his presumptuous and somewhat slanderous paragraph on what we assume must be our campground. We consider it a personal affront. The attack certainly sounds pompous and pretentious. We are all proud owners and weekend landscapers of campsites next door. Our community ranges in age from 2 - 96 and includes professionals, retirees, common working people and those who simply want to get away from their homes for a rest. In this area, there is no need for fencing, as respect is the accepted order of the day.
The park is attractive and caters to RVs and trailers from California to Alaska and all part in-between. It is noted for its courteous workforce, swimming pools, beach walks, and its many activities. People, in this family-oriented park, get along and assist one another. It may seem like another way of life to Mr. Remer and we feel sorry for his narrow approach to life and neighbours. Were he to park his tent beside a half-million-dollar RV, he would be made welcome and shown respect. We do not all travel in similar circles with silver and fine china. Sometimes we even resort to plastic utensils and paper plates!
It should also be noted that 11 p.m. is quiet time, both as a courtesy to neighbours in the park as well as to the outside premises. Guests abide by the rules. Outside neighbours do not always show the same courtesy. Dogs are leashed and owners clean up after them. Not all neighbours show this similar courtesy.
It certainly seems unfortunate that Mr. Remer has not been able to experience such varied living in his lifetime. In fact, he is to be pitied for his narrow-mindedness. Many of us have travelled to exotic places, but it is always pleasant to have a second home. A mind should always be open to new experiences with a willingness to accept the other half. Whatever happened to the old adages, “Live and Let Live” and “Love Thy Neighbour”?
No, we do not need fences in our community, but perhaps Mr. Remer does, as obviously he does not want to associate with the “riff raff.” A fence without a periscope would be preferable!
I write, on behalf of many happy but insulted campers next door.
Jackie Boucher
Oak Bay
After reading the “Etiquette Guy” in the June 21 edition of the Telegraph- Journal, we feel it necessary to object to his presumptuous and somewhat slanderous paragraph on what we assume must be our campground. We consider it a personal affront. The attack certainly sounds pompous and pretentious. We are all proud owners and weekend landscapers of campsites next door. Our community ranges in age from 2 - 96 and includes professionals, retirees, common working people and those who simply want to get away from their homes for a rest. In this area, there is no need for fencing, as respect is the accepted order of the day.
The park is attractive and caters to RVs and trailers from California to Alaska and all part in-between. It is noted for its courteous workforce, swimming pools, beach walks, and its many activities. People, in this family-oriented park, get along and assist one another. It may seem like another way of life to Mr. Remer and we feel sorry for his narrow approach to life and neighbours. Were he to park his tent beside a half-million-dollar RV, he would be made welcome and shown respect. We do not all travel in similar circles with silver and fine china. Sometimes we even resort to plastic utensils and paper plates!
It should also be noted that 11 p.m. is quiet time, both as a courtesy to neighbours in the park as well as to the outside premises. Guests abide by the rules. Outside neighbours do not always show the same courtesy. Dogs are leashed and owners clean up after them. Not all neighbours show this similar courtesy.
It certainly seems unfortunate that Mr. Remer has not been able to experience such varied living in his lifetime. In fact, he is to be pitied for his narrow-mindedness. Many of us have travelled to exotic places, but it is always pleasant to have a second home. A mind should always be open to new experiences with a willingness to accept the other half. Whatever happened to the old adages, “Live and Let Live” and “Love Thy Neighbour”?
No, we do not need fences in our community, but perhaps Mr. Remer does, as obviously he does not want to associate with the “riff raff.” A fence without a periscope would be preferable!
I write, on behalf of many happy but insulted campers next door.
Jackie Boucher
Oak Bay
Town to enforce pool fence bylaw
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
As the bylaw enforcement officer for the Town of St. Stephen one of my duties is to ensure that all pools have fencing as defined in our local bylaw. An estimated 58 children age 14 and under drown each year in Canada, while another 140 are hospitalized for near drowning. This is equal to about two elementary school classrooms of children dying every year.
Since swimming pools are involved in nearly half of all drowning and near drowning incidents for children under 14 years, measures must be taken to reduce drowning in these environments. Both in-ground and above-ground pools are a potential hazard. During my career in the RCMP I had occasion to attend to one such tragic event involving a five-year-old. It was not his parents’ pool but rather belonged to a neighbour with no fencing or locked gate on his above ground pool.
Many drowning deaths happen in private homes with unfenced or inadequately fenced swimming pools and spas. In most cases the pools (95 per cent) have inadequate safety gates.
Pools are a particular hazard for children under 5 years old because they are attracted to water but lack a clear sense of danger.
Drowning of young children often occurs when the child is walking or playing near water, not when they are swimming or intending to go in the water. Most happen when the child gets near water during a momentary lapse in adult supervision.
Researchers estimate that proper fencing could prevent sevent out of 10 drowning incidents in home swimming pools for children under 5.
During the past several months I along with the town building Inspector have identified several homes in the town that have no or inadequate fencing. The town has sent letters to these residences identifying the situation and asking that they take the responsible action required. In each and every case there has not been a positive response. I do not know if it is because they feel they are immune from such occurrences or just do not see the urgency of the situation.
The town has the responsibility to each and every resident to ensure that they or their families are not put in harm’s way by virtue of negligence of the few. Enforcement is not always the preferred choice of addressing situations but at times the only means.
Mark J. Fleming
Town of St. Stephen
Bylaw Enforcement Officer
As the bylaw enforcement officer for the Town of St. Stephen one of my duties is to ensure that all pools have fencing as defined in our local bylaw. An estimated 58 children age 14 and under drown each year in Canada, while another 140 are hospitalized for near drowning. This is equal to about two elementary school classrooms of children dying every year.
Since swimming pools are involved in nearly half of all drowning and near drowning incidents for children under 14 years, measures must be taken to reduce drowning in these environments. Both in-ground and above-ground pools are a potential hazard. During my career in the RCMP I had occasion to attend to one such tragic event involving a five-year-old. It was not his parents’ pool but rather belonged to a neighbour with no fencing or locked gate on his above ground pool.
Many drowning deaths happen in private homes with unfenced or inadequately fenced swimming pools and spas. In most cases the pools (95 per cent) have inadequate safety gates.
Pools are a particular hazard for children under 5 years old because they are attracted to water but lack a clear sense of danger.
Drowning of young children often occurs when the child is walking or playing near water, not when they are swimming or intending to go in the water. Most happen when the child gets near water during a momentary lapse in adult supervision.
Researchers estimate that proper fencing could prevent sevent out of 10 drowning incidents in home swimming pools for children under 5.
During the past several months I along with the town building Inspector have identified several homes in the town that have no or inadequate fencing. The town has sent letters to these residences identifying the situation and asking that they take the responsible action required. In each and every case there has not been a positive response. I do not know if it is because they feel they are immune from such occurrences or just do not see the urgency of the situation.
The town has the responsibility to each and every resident to ensure that they or their families are not put in harm’s way by virtue of negligence of the few. Enforcement is not always the preferred choice of addressing situations but at times the only means.
Mark J. Fleming
Town of St. Stephen
Bylaw Enforcement Officer
Food Glorious Food
FOOD GLORIOUS FOOD
Columnist offers free garden space
Columnist offers free garden space
By Patrick Cummins
An Alternate Aspect
An Alternate Aspect
There are two ideas I would like to try and address this week, the first is “Food, glorious food” as the kids, in the musical 'Oliver', sang. Ah yes indeed, the mere mention of good food is enough to send many a good man, me included, into quivering raptures (as my girth all too obviously attests).
I remember the feasts of my travels, from ô-á-chian (Oyster omelet, made with eggs, oysters and Garland chrysanthemum leaves) followed by pearl milk tea in Taiwan to a slice of abalone on the seafront of Hermosa Beach in California. From pigs' tails and 'kraut in Kitchener to a proper blood pudding in Liverpool, the range and style of food is endless. Titillating, tempting, alluring, beguiling, tantalizing, the adjectives are never ending. So it is particularly galling that in my retirement years I live in an area with a paucity of good kai. (Now, don't say you don't at least learn from this column, kai is a New Zealand expression meaning solid food).
Don't get me wrong, good basic food is available but it is the nuances, the little extras, that are sadly missed. This may be caused by geography or circumstance and, in many instances by governments that support inept and inefficient farming practices and then have the temerity to tax you, the consumer, and subsidize these feckless producers. Indirectly encourage them to produce inferior product. Also we are limited to only two main food stores, which shall remain nameless, one of which, if it continues to improve at the current rate, could well achieve the status of mediocre in three or four years and the other of which, although it seemed to start with good intentions, has now unfortunately re-branded itself and presently retails largely drek and welfare style foods.
But, the season is upon us when we can break free and live a little, enjoy some exotic cuisine. The bounteous season of fruits and vegetables is approaching. A chance to save; for the average family I would estimate over $800 or more if you venture into making relishes and preserves and even cakes with your produce. Front line crops in this battle to liberate us from the purgatory of store-dictated, carcinogen-laden produce are zucchini and beans, both easy to grow and bountiful in output. Tomatoes, although a little less forgiving, are well worth the effort. It might be worth noting that one of the benefits of the fall of the Soviet Union was that native Russian varieties (Silvery fir, Black Russian etc.) became readily available in the west and gave us a more robust and stronger-tasting product.
Remember also that this produce can be, if you choose, pesticide free and truly organic; a healthy treat for all the family. Add in a few extra crops like onions, radish and parsnip and your vegetable requirements will be met for almost eight months (allowing for the storage of squash and onions, etc.).
Which brings me to the second point. St. Stephen is a fine town in a great location but it does need a bit more pride, a little more involvement from all of us. Can we help each other to make St. Stephen a better, more caring place? If you continue to read on, please do not just put the paper down and say “good idea” or even “rubbish” and nothing more. If you can, follow through, do something.
I would propose that many in town with children and/or in straightened circumstances would indeed like to grow their own produce but do not have anywhere to do it. I am, by this column, offering a couple of families or individuals access to my garden to grow a few vegetables. They would be responsible for maintenance and clean up, but they are welcome to use my tools, the only caveat being that they will donate about 20 per cent of their output to a local charity. Just contact me by e-mail.
Can you do the same or similar? Will you help? St. Stephen has so much to offer, be a prime mover in realizing the potential.
Thank you.
Patrick Cummins' column appears every second Friday. Catch his latest column on Friday, June 27.
Sir James Dunn Academy Grand March
Order these and other photos that have appeared in the Courier by calling 466-3220 or visiting our St. Stephen office.
Photos by Barb Rayner/Courier
Fundy High School Graduation
Fundy High School Class of 2008
Photos By Barb Rayner/Courier
FOR MORE, SEE THE COURIER WEEKEND, JUNE 27
Order these and other photos by calling 466-3220 or stopping in to our St. Stephen offices.
Photos By Barb Rayner/Courier
FOR MORE, SEE THE COURIER WEEKEND, JUNE 27
Order these and other photos by calling 466-3220 or stopping in to our St. Stephen offices.
Who will be Charlotte County's Next Big Talent?
WHO'S GOING TO WIN?
Leave a comment and make your prediction...
After 7 Weeks of Competition...
It Has All Come Down To This...
Don't Miss The Final 3 Tonight as they take to the talent stage one last time for your vote to become Charlotte County's Next Big Talent.
Tonight's Line-Up Includes Performances From:
The Top 3
(Twenty-Nine and Holding, James DiPaolo and Nick Gay)
Balliver
Stage Stompers
A Downeast Idol Group Number
and...
CCGT Group Number
It's all happening tonight at St. Stephen High School starting at 7:30Pm. Doors open at 7:00PM and Admission is $5. We will also have 50/50 and a donations jar for anyone wishing to donate above and beyond to the cause.
Again, Tonight, SSHS, $5 Admission....It's the show YOU DON't WANT TO MISS!
Who Will Be Charlotte County's Next Big Talent??!?!
--
Anthony Enman
Producer/Host
Charlotte County's Got Talent
ccgottalent@gmail.com
Leave a comment and make your prediction...
After 7 Weeks of Competition...
It Has All Come Down To This...
Don't Miss The Final 3 Tonight as they take to the talent stage one last time for your vote to become Charlotte County's Next Big Talent.
Tonight's Line-Up Includes Performances From:
The Top 3
(Twenty-Nine and Holding, James DiPaolo and Nick Gay)
Balliver
Stage Stompers
A Downeast Idol Group Number
and...
CCGT Group Number
It's all happening tonight at St. Stephen High School starting at 7:30Pm. Doors open at 7:00PM and Admission is $5. We will also have 50/50 and a donations jar for anyone wishing to donate above and beyond to the cause.
Again, Tonight, SSHS, $5 Admission....It's the show YOU DON't WANT TO MISS!
Who Will Be Charlotte County's Next Big Talent??!?!
--
Anthony Enman
Producer/Host
Charlotte County's Got Talent
ccgottalent@gmail.com
Friday, June 20, 2008
Fundy High School Grand March
To order prints, contact us at 466-3220, e-mail joanne@stcroixcourier.ca or stop in to our St. Stephen office Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Tempers flare at village council meeting
By BARB RAYNER
BLACKS HARBOUR – Tempers flared at Tuesday night’s special village council meeting as Mayor Terry James clashed with the village manager and some councillors on several issues.
At one stage the mayor was so visibly upset by what was going on that she called for a five-minute adjournment and disappeared into her office to collect herself.
She also suggested during the meeting that she would like some conflict resolution between her and village manager Deanna Hunter because they need to be working together not pulling apart.
At the start of the meeting, Deputy Mayor Louise McLaughlin asked if a motion made at the last meeting relating to how often council should meet could be brought back to the table since the mayor had failed to ask for the question at that time.
Councillor Fred Murray pointed out that the motion had been approved at that meeting but it could be brought back to the table again in three months time at the September meeting.
However, Mayor James felt that since there was an error in procedure, which she apologized for, she thought it should be brought back to the table again that night but Councillor Murray said it needed the approval of full council to put it back on the agenda again that night.
Hunter pointed out that a special meeting was called only for certain items. Mayor James said Deputy Mayor McLaughlin had asked for this item to be included on the agenda for that night but had been told by staff that she couldn’t do that.
She also complained that the draft agenda council receives before a council meeting is not the same as the one that they receive at the meeting.
At this stage the deputy mayor apologized for bringing the item up and said she would never have raised the issue if she had known it would start an argument.
Since the agenda had already been approved, Hunter said she thought Deputy Mayor McLaughlin would have to wait three months to bring the matter up again and Councillor David Mahar said there was no problem to put the matter on the table again for the September meeting.
Later in the meeting, Mayor James presented a committee list she had drawn up for 2008-2009. She explained that following the last meeting, when committees had been set up, she had been approached by a number of councillors expressing concerns over the lack of input or consideration of their wishes.
“I reviewed the proposed committee list and there were obvious discrepancies. For example, one councillor was chairperson of every committee he wished to sit on and was not a member of any committee while our deputy mayor was not offered one chair position,” James said.
The mayor said there was an imbalance that she had addressed with her committee list and in a year’s time it would be reviewed again allowing some movement amongst committees by council members.
When Councillor Mahar was emphatic that he would not vote in favour of this list, the mayor said she had been approached by a couple of councillors who felt he had dominated the committee selection following the last meeting and they didn’t have a chance for any input. He denied dominating anything.
Mayor James said that, according to the Department of Local Government, she has the right to select committees but Hunter said that according to the Municipalities Act the mayor is subject to the direction and control of council so must abide by their decision.
Hunter said this was the second time they had gone through this and read a letter from the town solicitor, which stated that committees must be appointed by council and not the mayor then the mayor can appoint the chairs unless objected to by council.
At this stage, Mayor James said she knew what her rights were and she was prepared to take the issue to a higher authority but Hunter pointed out that if they don’t soon have committees, council will fall behind in its work.
Both Councillor Mahar and Councillor Murray questioned the membership on some of the revised committees but the mayor said she was just trying to be fair so someone does not have all the control. At this point Councillor Mahar noted that she was chair of four committees herself.
After some heated discussion, Councillor Murray moved that council accept the committee list from the previous meeting. Voting was three in favour with Councillor Doug Cooke voting against and the deputy mayor abstaining.
Hunter later raised the issue of the mayor contacting Fundy Nursing Home regarding the village’s representative on the board of directors.
Mayor James said she contacted them to find out if she was supposed to appoint someone to the board and was surprised when she was told she could not have a list of names as she did not realize this was confidential.
Hunter said she is the village representative and explained that the board made changes to the bylaws a number of years ago so they now have the authority to appoint someone and it does not necessarily have to be a council member.
The mayor questioned who appointed her and Hunter said she had been there almost three years but if council felt there was a problem with her sitting on that board or any other committee they should say so and she will resign.
“If not, I don’t want to hear anything more about these things I am on,” Hunter said.
At this point Councillor Murray said it seemed there appeared to be a collision coming here between the mayor and the town manager. He said the mayor’s job is to preside over council meetings, give a vision for the future and keep order while the CAO’s job is to run the village.
Mayor James said all she did was ask a question about the board appointment but agreed that there is a conflict and she needed some help.
She said she would not quit but she would like some conflict resolution between her and the town manager so they can move forward on the village’s projects. The mayor said they needed cohesion and not to be pulling apart.
Both she and Hunter referred to the difficulties they have had working together over the last four years but Mayor James added that she had yet to meet someone she could not get along with.
Councillor Murray, who previously served on council from 2002 to 2004, said that during that time he never once claimed for mileage or meals and paid taxes on the remuneration he received.
Referring to comments made by the mayor following the last meeting, when council voted to hold seven regular meetings a year rather than 12, he disagreed that councilors get $200 per meeting – he said they get $2,500 a year.
Back in 2003 he said he introduced two amendments – to reduce the number of councillors from five to four at the next election and to reduce the annual remuneration by $500 for both the mayor and council, which would have meant a reduction in the village tax rate.
Both motions were defeated but he said that seeing as how there have been comments made about remuneration he asked each member of council to contact him during the summer on this issue.
Councillor Murray took issue with Mayor James’ comments that the committees of the previous council were not working.
Having 30 years experience sitting on boards and committees, he said he had always found that committees were only as strong as their leaders. A leader who can lead, delegate and share authority makes for an exceptional chair, he said.
With a mayor who has four years experience, three councillors with prior experience and two new councillors who are showing their willingness to work, he said they can make a strong and unique council.
“My hope is we can work as a team. The previous council moved us forward and it is our duty to continue to move forward. As for the mayor suggesting my resignation, that isn’t going to happen,” he said.
He said the mayor calling for a vote before the question was taking away his right to discussion on a motion and he thought she should know the contents of the procedural bylaw.
Mayor James said she knows she makes mistakes and when she does, she doesn’t mind having them pointed out to her. As for the committees, she said in the case of the prior council the majority of the committees didn’t meet and were not bringing back reports.
Councillor Murray said the mayor had said committees were hogwash but the meeting that evening had not accomplished much and if they continue that way, meeting 12 times a year won’t accomplish much either.
BLACKS HARBOUR – Tempers flared at Tuesday night’s special village council meeting as Mayor Terry James clashed with the village manager and some councillors on several issues.
At one stage the mayor was so visibly upset by what was going on that she called for a five-minute adjournment and disappeared into her office to collect herself.
She also suggested during the meeting that she would like some conflict resolution between her and village manager Deanna Hunter because they need to be working together not pulling apart.
At the start of the meeting, Deputy Mayor Louise McLaughlin asked if a motion made at the last meeting relating to how often council should meet could be brought back to the table since the mayor had failed to ask for the question at that time.
Councillor Fred Murray pointed out that the motion had been approved at that meeting but it could be brought back to the table again in three months time at the September meeting.
However, Mayor James felt that since there was an error in procedure, which she apologized for, she thought it should be brought back to the table again that night but Councillor Murray said it needed the approval of full council to put it back on the agenda again that night.
Hunter pointed out that a special meeting was called only for certain items. Mayor James said Deputy Mayor McLaughlin had asked for this item to be included on the agenda for that night but had been told by staff that she couldn’t do that.
She also complained that the draft agenda council receives before a council meeting is not the same as the one that they receive at the meeting.
At this stage the deputy mayor apologized for bringing the item up and said she would never have raised the issue if she had known it would start an argument.
Since the agenda had already been approved, Hunter said she thought Deputy Mayor McLaughlin would have to wait three months to bring the matter up again and Councillor David Mahar said there was no problem to put the matter on the table again for the September meeting.
Later in the meeting, Mayor James presented a committee list she had drawn up for 2008-2009. She explained that following the last meeting, when committees had been set up, she had been approached by a number of councillors expressing concerns over the lack of input or consideration of their wishes.
“I reviewed the proposed committee list and there were obvious discrepancies. For example, one councillor was chairperson of every committee he wished to sit on and was not a member of any committee while our deputy mayor was not offered one chair position,” James said.
The mayor said there was an imbalance that she had addressed with her committee list and in a year’s time it would be reviewed again allowing some movement amongst committees by council members.
When Councillor Mahar was emphatic that he would not vote in favour of this list, the mayor said she had been approached by a couple of councillors who felt he had dominated the committee selection following the last meeting and they didn’t have a chance for any input. He denied dominating anything.
Mayor James said that, according to the Department of Local Government, she has the right to select committees but Hunter said that according to the Municipalities Act the mayor is subject to the direction and control of council so must abide by their decision.
Hunter said this was the second time they had gone through this and read a letter from the town solicitor, which stated that committees must be appointed by council and not the mayor then the mayor can appoint the chairs unless objected to by council.
At this stage, Mayor James said she knew what her rights were and she was prepared to take the issue to a higher authority but Hunter pointed out that if they don’t soon have committees, council will fall behind in its work.
Both Councillor Mahar and Councillor Murray questioned the membership on some of the revised committees but the mayor said she was just trying to be fair so someone does not have all the control. At this point Councillor Mahar noted that she was chair of four committees herself.
After some heated discussion, Councillor Murray moved that council accept the committee list from the previous meeting. Voting was three in favour with Councillor Doug Cooke voting against and the deputy mayor abstaining.
Hunter later raised the issue of the mayor contacting Fundy Nursing Home regarding the village’s representative on the board of directors.
Mayor James said she contacted them to find out if she was supposed to appoint someone to the board and was surprised when she was told she could not have a list of names as she did not realize this was confidential.
Hunter said she is the village representative and explained that the board made changes to the bylaws a number of years ago so they now have the authority to appoint someone and it does not necessarily have to be a council member.
The mayor questioned who appointed her and Hunter said she had been there almost three years but if council felt there was a problem with her sitting on that board or any other committee they should say so and she will resign.
“If not, I don’t want to hear anything more about these things I am on,” Hunter said.
At this point Councillor Murray said it seemed there appeared to be a collision coming here between the mayor and the town manager. He said the mayor’s job is to preside over council meetings, give a vision for the future and keep order while the CAO’s job is to run the village.
Mayor James said all she did was ask a question about the board appointment but agreed that there is a conflict and she needed some help.
She said she would not quit but she would like some conflict resolution between her and the town manager so they can move forward on the village’s projects. The mayor said they needed cohesion and not to be pulling apart.
Both she and Hunter referred to the difficulties they have had working together over the last four years but Mayor James added that she had yet to meet someone she could not get along with.
Councillor Murray, who previously served on council from 2002 to 2004, said that during that time he never once claimed for mileage or meals and paid taxes on the remuneration he received.
Referring to comments made by the mayor following the last meeting, when council voted to hold seven regular meetings a year rather than 12, he disagreed that councilors get $200 per meeting – he said they get $2,500 a year.
Back in 2003 he said he introduced two amendments – to reduce the number of councillors from five to four at the next election and to reduce the annual remuneration by $500 for both the mayor and council, which would have meant a reduction in the village tax rate.
Both motions were defeated but he said that seeing as how there have been comments made about remuneration he asked each member of council to contact him during the summer on this issue.
Councillor Murray took issue with Mayor James’ comments that the committees of the previous council were not working.
Having 30 years experience sitting on boards and committees, he said he had always found that committees were only as strong as their leaders. A leader who can lead, delegate and share authority makes for an exceptional chair, he said.
With a mayor who has four years experience, three councillors with prior experience and two new councillors who are showing their willingness to work, he said they can make a strong and unique council.
“My hope is we can work as a team. The previous council moved us forward and it is our duty to continue to move forward. As for the mayor suggesting my resignation, that isn’t going to happen,” he said.
He said the mayor calling for a vote before the question was taking away his right to discussion on a motion and he thought she should know the contents of the procedural bylaw.
Mayor James said she knows she makes mistakes and when she does, she doesn’t mind having them pointed out to her. As for the committees, she said in the case of the prior council the majority of the committees didn’t meet and were not bringing back reports.
Councillor Murray said the mayor had said committees were hogwash but the meeting that evening had not accomplished much and if they continue that way, meeting 12 times a year won’t accomplish much either.
Mayor feels abused, sickened by council actions
TERRY JAMES
Guest Commentary
As Mayor of the Village of Blacks Harbour, I wish to apologize to our guests who attended Tuesday night’s special meeting of council, for the conduct displayed not only by myself, but also by others as well. I am really struggling in getting council to work together, and it was obvious to all in attendance that our CAO and I do not get along, which is quite unfortunate. This situation has been brewing for quite some time, and I am at a loss in terms of how to deal with it. I requested a conflict resolution process, so what else do you do?
You wouldn’t believe what I’ve put up with for the past four years. For basically a volunteer position, no one should have to go through what I did Tuesday night, and many nights previous to that. The majority of the people in the Village of Blacks Harbour elected me, for a SECOND time, to continue to move our municipality forward. They have come to count on me for my frank and honest opinion and recognize and value my work ethic. People here know that I am a fair person, and if compelled, I am not afraid to speak my mind. To be screamed at and intimidated to the point of tears, no one should have to go through that! And it’s not the first time, but I can guarantee you, it was certainly the last time!
Do you know that when Councillor David Mahar lost control and started hollering at me, for a moment I thought he was going to hit me? I was abused by my ex husband and, briefly, I was back in my old place looking at an enraged lunatic and I was fearful for my safety. That flashback immediately brought on chest pain. If I was a man sitting in the mayor’s chair, do you actually believe he would have conducted himself in the same manner? Not to mention the CAO’s constant mutterings that were adding fuel to the fire.
Things escalated to a crescendo of sorts and even though I wasn’t sobbing, tears started to fall down my cheeks from anger and frustration. I developed pain in my chest, and became dizzy. I had to call an adjournment before I told some people what I really thought of them or before I dropped from a heart attack right then and there. I went into my office, staggered into the side of the desk bruising my hip, and tried to concentrate on calming myself so my chest would stop hurting. I realized if I dropped in there, I’d probably be on the floor a good long while, before anyone came looking for me. I just prayed to God for strength to get through this, and He gave it to me. Amazingly, I was able to return to council chambers and conduct the rest of the meeting, even though all I wanted to do was to leave. I am on blood pressure medication. After Tuesday night’s events, I plan on seeing my physician immediately; maybe on council nights I’ll have to double the dose.
Some people reading this would scratch their head and wonder why would this woman put herself through such an ordeal for $3,500 a year? I’ll tell you why. Because this municipality has to catch up with the times, and the “old days” and the stinking “old boys network”, and those “unwritten policies” and “unnamed sources” – that crap has got to go. I told them last night, and I’m telling your readers right now, they (meaning the CAO and council) will NEVER make me quit.
The last group gave it their best shot, and they weren’t successful, this group won’t be either. Despite the obstacles put in my path during my last term, I STILL was successful in fulfilling most of my election mandate. My most notable achievement was the $1.8 million MRIF for our infrastructure. Think of what I could have accomplished with a little help and co-operation. We, as a municipality, still have a long way to go. Councillor Murray spoke about leadership Tuesday night. I do agree leadership comes from the top. But apparently, in this case, only if it’s a man at the top, not a woman.
So, to those of you, the majority of the taxpayers here in the Village of Blacks Harbour, who put your trust in me and gave me your vote, please know that despite what you might hear on the streets, I will continue to work for you, and fulfill the mandate that you have set out before me. I encourage you to call your councillors and find out for yourself what’s going on down here. On May 12 I needed your vote, today I need your support and your voice.
Terry James is the mayor of Blacks Harbour.
Guest Commentary
As Mayor of the Village of Blacks Harbour, I wish to apologize to our guests who attended Tuesday night’s special meeting of council, for the conduct displayed not only by myself, but also by others as well. I am really struggling in getting council to work together, and it was obvious to all in attendance that our CAO and I do not get along, which is quite unfortunate. This situation has been brewing for quite some time, and I am at a loss in terms of how to deal with it. I requested a conflict resolution process, so what else do you do?
You wouldn’t believe what I’ve put up with for the past four years. For basically a volunteer position, no one should have to go through what I did Tuesday night, and many nights previous to that. The majority of the people in the Village of Blacks Harbour elected me, for a SECOND time, to continue to move our municipality forward. They have come to count on me for my frank and honest opinion and recognize and value my work ethic. People here know that I am a fair person, and if compelled, I am not afraid to speak my mind. To be screamed at and intimidated to the point of tears, no one should have to go through that! And it’s not the first time, but I can guarantee you, it was certainly the last time!
Do you know that when Councillor David Mahar lost control and started hollering at me, for a moment I thought he was going to hit me? I was abused by my ex husband and, briefly, I was back in my old place looking at an enraged lunatic and I was fearful for my safety. That flashback immediately brought on chest pain. If I was a man sitting in the mayor’s chair, do you actually believe he would have conducted himself in the same manner? Not to mention the CAO’s constant mutterings that were adding fuel to the fire.
Things escalated to a crescendo of sorts and even though I wasn’t sobbing, tears started to fall down my cheeks from anger and frustration. I developed pain in my chest, and became dizzy. I had to call an adjournment before I told some people what I really thought of them or before I dropped from a heart attack right then and there. I went into my office, staggered into the side of the desk bruising my hip, and tried to concentrate on calming myself so my chest would stop hurting. I realized if I dropped in there, I’d probably be on the floor a good long while, before anyone came looking for me. I just prayed to God for strength to get through this, and He gave it to me. Amazingly, I was able to return to council chambers and conduct the rest of the meeting, even though all I wanted to do was to leave. I am on blood pressure medication. After Tuesday night’s events, I plan on seeing my physician immediately; maybe on council nights I’ll have to double the dose.
Some people reading this would scratch their head and wonder why would this woman put herself through such an ordeal for $3,500 a year? I’ll tell you why. Because this municipality has to catch up with the times, and the “old days” and the stinking “old boys network”, and those “unwritten policies” and “unnamed sources” – that crap has got to go. I told them last night, and I’m telling your readers right now, they (meaning the CAO and council) will NEVER make me quit.
The last group gave it their best shot, and they weren’t successful, this group won’t be either. Despite the obstacles put in my path during my last term, I STILL was successful in fulfilling most of my election mandate. My most notable achievement was the $1.8 million MRIF for our infrastructure. Think of what I could have accomplished with a little help and co-operation. We, as a municipality, still have a long way to go. Councillor Murray spoke about leadership Tuesday night. I do agree leadership comes from the top. But apparently, in this case, only if it’s a man at the top, not a woman.
So, to those of you, the majority of the taxpayers here in the Village of Blacks Harbour, who put your trust in me and gave me your vote, please know that despite what you might hear on the streets, I will continue to work for you, and fulfill the mandate that you have set out before me. I encourage you to call your councillors and find out for yourself what’s going on down here. On May 12 I needed your vote, today I need your support and your voice.
Terry James is the mayor of Blacks Harbour.
Fighting words
EDITORIAL
What we said about l'affaire Blacks Harbour...
The newly non-elected Blacks Harbour’s village council is teetering on the brink and if something doesn’t give, it will soon become a provincial nightmare, or joke.
Mayor Terry James (who was voted in as mayor on May 12) has been fighting bitterly with councillors (who were not voted in but took their seats by acclamation) for the past two months. Their fights have been over how often to meet and over who will chair which committees. These are, in the big picture, petty issues over personalities and power that will hold any governing body back and distract it from real issues at hand.
At the village’s latest meeting James said she was “screamed at” and had to excuse herself when she became overwhelmed and frightened. She’s no wallflower herself and no doubt can give as well as she gets but reports from that meeting indicate that debate has devolved in the Blacks Harbour council chambers. It’s OK for elected officials to disagree and it’s OK for them to make their points with passion and to stand their ground when they believe they are right. It’s not OK for some of those officials, and members of the public, to leave a meeting feeling like they’ve witnessed an ugly brawl.
James has suggested entering into a formal conflict resolution process to help overcome a personality clash between her and the village CAO. It’s a reasonable proposition based on what’s been transpiring early in the new term.
Maybe the municipal governance training the councillors are receiving this weekend will help them see that personal conflicts can’t be permitted to intrude into council meetings or official village business. The Blacks Harbour village councillors didn’t have to ask residents for their votes in May but they do still owe them their services – professional, courteous and dignified. They can disagree without being disagreeable.
What we said about l'affaire Blacks Harbour...
The newly non-elected Blacks Harbour’s village council is teetering on the brink and if something doesn’t give, it will soon become a provincial nightmare, or joke.
Mayor Terry James (who was voted in as mayor on May 12) has been fighting bitterly with councillors (who were not voted in but took their seats by acclamation) for the past two months. Their fights have been over how often to meet and over who will chair which committees. These are, in the big picture, petty issues over personalities and power that will hold any governing body back and distract it from real issues at hand.
At the village’s latest meeting James said she was “screamed at” and had to excuse herself when she became overwhelmed and frightened. She’s no wallflower herself and no doubt can give as well as she gets but reports from that meeting indicate that debate has devolved in the Blacks Harbour council chambers. It’s OK for elected officials to disagree and it’s OK for them to make their points with passion and to stand their ground when they believe they are right. It’s not OK for some of those officials, and members of the public, to leave a meeting feeling like they’ve witnessed an ugly brawl.
James has suggested entering into a formal conflict resolution process to help overcome a personality clash between her and the village CAO. It’s a reasonable proposition based on what’s been transpiring early in the new term.
Maybe the municipal governance training the councillors are receiving this weekend will help them see that personal conflicts can’t be permitted to intrude into council meetings or official village business. The Blacks Harbour village councillors didn’t have to ask residents for their votes in May but they do still owe them their services – professional, courteous and dignified. They can disagree without being disagreeable.
The grads go marching in...
Friday's Courier Weekend includes two pages of Grand March coverage - from St. Stephen High School and Fundy High... Here are some blog extras to tide you over.
Barb Rayner/Courier
Barb Rayner/CourierMonday, June 16, 2008
Looking Back
I just finished proof reading our "Looking Back" feature, compiled every issue by Joanne Mires. Every time I read it I learn something or I at least go "hmm."
There's always familiar names and places, reminders of how Charlotte County communities developed and almost shocking parallels drawn between what was happening 10, 30, 60 and 90 years ago and what's happening today.
This week you can read about Deer Island's Class of '78 and spot some familiar names in the cast list of the SSHS Drama Club (Helen Johnston, you've always been an actor!)
Then there's a report about a fiery young politician who was busting onto the scene with some big promises. His name was Sheldon Lee.
And a note about a former Courier editor passing away... at age 45.
Hmmm.
There's always familiar names and places, reminders of how Charlotte County communities developed and almost shocking parallels drawn between what was happening 10, 30, 60 and 90 years ago and what's happening today.
This week you can read about Deer Island's Class of '78 and spot some familiar names in the cast list of the SSHS Drama Club (Helen Johnston, you've always been an actor!)
Then there's a report about a fiery young politician who was busting onto the scene with some big promises. His name was Sheldon Lee.
And a note about a former Courier editor passing away... at age 45.
Hmmm.
Friday, June 13, 2008
SHAWN GRAHAM SELF SUFFICIENCEY UPDATE
C'mon kids, it's time for our favourite game - find the tired old meaningless reference to "self-sufficiency" in the New Brunswick government news release.
When you're ready...
CLICK HERE
OR HERE
OR HERE
OR... NO... DON'T CLICK HERE
You clicked, didn't you. Well... we warned you not to!
When you're ready...
CLICK HERE
OR HERE
OR HERE
OR... NO... DON'T CLICK HERE
You clicked, didn't you. Well... we warned you not to!
Canal Beach garbage
GARBAGE COLLECTED FROM CANAL BEACH, ST. GEORGE
Photo submitted
FROM ONE OF OUR READERS: "These pictures were taken Monday morning, June 9th at Canal Beach. The large group of young people drinking at the beach made sure to leave it as destroyed as they could. You can't really tell from these pictures, but they smashed the bottles into splinter size pieces of glass which made it impossible to pick it all up. The sand in that area now requires a sand sifter to sift all the glass out. There's still tons of glass there. This is just another example of vandalism in our community that should not be tolerated. Citizens need to take action and put a stop to this vandalism. This beach is too beautiful to let a bunch of brazen and ignorant punks destroy it. Such a shame we can't have anything nice in our area......so discouraging."
MARK TAYLOR'S You Might Be From Charlotte County If...
YOU MIGHT BE FROM CHARLOTTE COUNTY IF...
By MARK TAYLOR Courier Columnist
By MARK TAYLOR Courier Columnist
1. You wear jogging pants and you have never gone and have no intention of going jogging.
2. You have barbecued baloney.
3. Your marriage proposal includes “You’re gonna have a what?”
4. You have picked up some beer on the way to work.
5. You have pictures of yourself beside giant weed plants.
6. Your wedding picture has a stick of tips in the background.
7. Your first words when you come out of a coma are, “Did I miss hunting season?”
8. You have ever used your kids swing set to pull the engine out of your vehicle.
9. The centerpiece on your lawn used to get 30 miles to the gallon.
10. You can’t find your lawnmower.
11. You have ever said “The war is on!” after you find out somebody is using your treestand.
12. You have ever complained about how dirty your white socks get when you wear sandals.
13. You have ever said, “Want a hit off that thing, Mom?”
14. You buy beer to expand your summer wardrobe with hats and shirts.
15. You refuse to slide in softball because you don’t want to crush your smokes.
16. You have a road sign under your wood stove.
17. You’ve watched the Stanley Cup playoffs in your underwear.
18. Your discarded freezer now holds your garbage.
19. You’ve worn a beer T shirt to a parent-teacher interview.
20. You know all the cast on the Trailer Park Boys, but don’t know your local MP or MLA.
21. You have ever checked your oil at a funeral.
22. You’ve thrown a party just to get the empties.
23. You have to get work done to your “rigging” and everybody knows you’re not going to a mechanic.
24. You cried the day your son/daughter first got served at the liquor store.
25. You’re paying higher payments on your 4 wheeler than your engagement ring.
26. You’re saving your beer bottles to buy a 4 wheeler.
27. You’ve ever been in a “racket” over booking vacation time for moose or deer season.
28. You check the Court News to see if any of your hockey, softball, darts, or crib teammates is going for a “trip.”
29. You have put an ad in the paper telling people to return shit that you have had stolen from you.
30. You use an abandoned or broken down in your yard car as lawn furniture.
NEW
31. You call everybody from outside the borders of Charlotte County “foreigners.”
32. You know when to sing, “Turn it up,” in the Sweet Home Alabama intro, but couldn’t sing O Canada to save your soul.
33. If you have ever said, “Got one home,” when asked at a store if you’d like a bag.
Everyone has an opinion... sometimes more than one
Someone e-mailed a letter to the editor to me recently and I replied with a thanks and said I love getting letters to the editor. This was the reply to the reply...
"You know, people DO love to talk about the letters...Sometimes good and sometimes
not, but they just wait for the paper to see if anyone has responded...we are a strange
lot, aren't we????"
Well, that got me thinking about letters and opinions and I don't think it's at all strange. Here's my reply to the reply to the reply...
That's kind of why I started the Blog too. Our letters page (and now the Blog site) should be a place where readers can gather and discuss issues.
I always get a little taken aback when people will call and blast us for an editorial on a personal level. Sometimes commentaries are intended to call for change or to launch criticism (if warranted) but sometimes we take an issue and write something somewhat opinionated in hopes of provoking some thought or discussion... here's a concept, agree or disagree... preferably in writing so we can share your views with our readers!
I once got called on at the last minute to be part of a seminar for journalists on the role of community papers and what the dailies can learn from us. I mentioned that I often write editorials from "the other side" as in I make a case for something I disagree with. I compared it to a debate - in which debaters often must argue a case they are given, not one they believe in. And it can be fun to look at an issue from someone else's viewpoint, try to understand it from a different perspective.
One veteran journalist was outraged at the idea of an editorial writer betraying his personal beliefs and values to argue a different side of an issue. I respectfully disagree. I don't think any editorial writer could honestly hold a strong enough opinion on enough issues to write "from the heart" in every edition. If I did that I'd be writing a lot of editorials about the Awesomeness of Chicken Wings and how Every Driver is an Idiot But Me.
And that would just be boring.
We value our letters from readers and it's a real treat to get one on a local issue that we can tell is written with passion and thought. It takes courage to put pen to paper, write an opinion and sign your name to it.
We don't print anonymous letters though we do allow anonymous Blog comments. We monitor them but we aren't out to censor them.
We had to refuse one letter to the editor recently and the person who wrote it is not happy with us. It dealt with an issue that we know is of prime importance to the writer but it levels criticism at individuals - calling certain people "liars" and worse.
Our lawyer reviewed the letter and said it would almost surely invite a lawsuit.
Our letter writer disrespectfully disagrees with us and our lawyers. It is, the person says, the truth. The subjects of the letter ARE liars the writer insists. Maybe. But we're not prepared to find that out in court. And we're not prepared to defame anyone in our community without evidence and facts to back it up.
That's my ramble for this morning.
Chuck
"You know, people DO love to talk about the letters...Sometimes good and sometimes
not, but they just wait for the paper to see if anyone has responded...we are a strange
lot, aren't we????"
Well, that got me thinking about letters and opinions and I don't think it's at all strange. Here's my reply to the reply to the reply...
That's kind of why I started the Blog too. Our letters page (and now the Blog site) should be a place where readers can gather and discuss issues.
I always get a little taken aback when people will call and blast us for an editorial on a personal level. Sometimes commentaries are intended to call for change or to launch criticism (if warranted) but sometimes we take an issue and write something somewhat opinionated in hopes of provoking some thought or discussion... here's a concept, agree or disagree... preferably in writing so we can share your views with our readers!
I once got called on at the last minute to be part of a seminar for journalists on the role of community papers and what the dailies can learn from us. I mentioned that I often write editorials from "the other side" as in I make a case for something I disagree with. I compared it to a debate - in which debaters often must argue a case they are given, not one they believe in. And it can be fun to look at an issue from someone else's viewpoint, try to understand it from a different perspective.
One veteran journalist was outraged at the idea of an editorial writer betraying his personal beliefs and values to argue a different side of an issue. I respectfully disagree. I don't think any editorial writer could honestly hold a strong enough opinion on enough issues to write "from the heart" in every edition. If I did that I'd be writing a lot of editorials about the Awesomeness of Chicken Wings and how Every Driver is an Idiot But Me.
And that would just be boring.
We value our letters from readers and it's a real treat to get one on a local issue that we can tell is written with passion and thought. It takes courage to put pen to paper, write an opinion and sign your name to it.
We don't print anonymous letters though we do allow anonymous Blog comments. We monitor them but we aren't out to censor them.
We had to refuse one letter to the editor recently and the person who wrote it is not happy with us. It dealt with an issue that we know is of prime importance to the writer but it levels criticism at individuals - calling certain people "liars" and worse.
Our lawyer reviewed the letter and said it would almost surely invite a lawsuit.
Our letter writer disrespectfully disagrees with us and our lawyers. It is, the person says, the truth. The subjects of the letter ARE liars the writer insists. Maybe. But we're not prepared to find that out in court. And we're not prepared to defame anyone in our community without evidence and facts to back it up.
That's my ramble for this morning.
Chuck
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Protest Protest
Circus draws crowds and critics
By SARI BOUDREAU
ST. STEPHEN – The circus came to St. Stephen Monday, drawing families and protesters to the Border Arena.
The Fabuleux Cirque Estival was in town for two shows and protesters were out on the sidewalk in front of the arena making the case that circuses are cruel to animals.
“I’m here protesting all circuses that use exotic and wild animals,” said protester Lee Ann Haggerty.
“The circus environment can do nothing to provide the social, mental and physical needs of wild and exotic animals.”
COMMENT HERE OR FOR MORE, READ THE SAINT CROIX COURIER, TUESDAY, JUNE 10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
